經濟危機英語
⑴ 求有關經濟危機的英語詞彙和一篇英語作文
常見金融英語詞彙一覽,應該有你需要的部分。
financial turmoil/meltdown 金融危機
Federal Reserve 美聯儲
real estate 房地產
share 股票
valuation 股價
equity market 股市
shareholder 股東
macroeconomic 宏觀經濟
saving account 儲蓄帳戶
go under 破產
take a nosedive （股市）大跌
tumble 下跌
big macs,big/large-cap stock,mega-issue 大盤股
offering,list 上市
bourse 證交所
corporate champion 龍頭企業
Shanghai Exchange 上海證交所
pension fund 養老基金
mutual fund 共同基金
hedge mutual fund 對沖式共同基金
underwriter 保險商
government bond 政府債券
budget 預算
deficit 赤字
delist 摘牌
mongey-loser 虧損企業
inventory 存貨
traded company,trading enterprise 上市公司
stakeholder 利益相關者
transparency 透明度
market fundamentalist 市場經濟基本規則
damage-contral machinery 安全顧問
efficient market 有效市場
intellectual property 知識產權
opportunistic practice 投機行為
entrepreneur 企業家
cook the book 做假帳
regulatory system 監管體系
portfolio 投資組合
money-market 短期資本市場
capital-market 長期資本市場
volatility 波動
diversification 多元化
option 期權
call option 看漲期權
put option 看跌期權
merger 並購
arbitrage 套利
Securities and Exchange Commission 〈美〉證券交易委員會
dollar standard 美元本位制
bad debt 壞帳
fiscal stimulus 財政刺激
a store of value 保值
transaction currency 結算貨幣
forward exchange 期貨交易
intervention currency 干預貨幣
Treasury bond 財政部公債
current-account 經常項目
pickup in rice 物價上漲
Federal Reserve 美聯儲
inflation 通貨膨脹
deflation 通貨緊縮
tighter credit 緊縮信貸
monetary policy 貨幣政策
foreigh exchange 外匯
spot transaction 即期交易
forward transaction 遠期交易
option forward transaction 擇期交易
swap transaction 調期交易
quote 報價
settlment and delivery 交割
buying rate 買入價
selling rate 賣出價
spread 差幅
contract 合同
at par 平價
premium 升水
discount 貼水
direct quoation method 直接報價法
indirect quoation method 間接報價法
dividend 股息
domestic currency 本幣
floating rate 浮動利率
parent company 母公司
credit swap 互惠貸款
venture capital 風險資本
book value 帳面價值
physical capital 實際資本
IPO(initial public offering) 新股首發；首次公開發行
job machine 就業市場
welfare capitalism 福利資本主義
collective market cap 市場資本總值
golbal corporation 跨國公司
transnational status 跨國優勢
transfer price 轉讓價格
consolidation 兼並
leverage 杠桿
file for bankruptcy 申請破產
lout 救助
take over 收購
buy out 購買(某人的)產權或全部貨物
falter 搖搖欲墜
on the hook 被套住
shore up confidence 提振市場信心
stave off 擋開, 避開,
liquidate assets 資產清算
at fire sale prices 超低價
sell-off 證券的跌價
有關經濟的作文：
Net Economy（網路經濟）
People are talking about the "new economy" It's very They see people face-to-face at their
job or in stores. People get information from newspapers, radios, televisions, reference books and the library.
In the new economy, people do business through the "net", which is a connection of millions of computers everywhere in the world. In the new economy, workers often work at home. They can get information on-line. They can communicate with employers and co-workers by e-mail. Customers
shop on-line. Businesses have "virtual stores". They are websites on which customers can see the procts. Businesses can sell to customers anywhere in the world.
In the new economy, people live a fast paced, convenient and colorful life. The whole world develops more rapidly than before. But the new economy is a double-edged sword.Its disadvantage is also obvious. For example, the Internet has led to a huge increase in credit-card cheating. Some illegal websites offer some cheap or banned goods or services.On-line shoppers who enter their credit-card information may never receive the goods they want to buy and their card informarion could even be for sale on an illegal website. So peopie in the new economy should be more smart and knowledgeable.
⑵ 求解十個關於經濟危機的英語單詞，並要求其附上英文解釋
可調整利率貸款項目 Option ARMs
房地產泡沫 real estate bubble
房地產泡沫The Housing Bubble
房地產泡沫破滅 the housing bubble busting
經濟衰退 economic declining
經濟危機 economic crisis
市場疲軟 market weak
信用危機 credit risk
系統風險 Systemic Risk
貶值 devaluation
抵押債務 collateralized debt obligations（CDO)
住房抵押貸款證券 mortgage-backed securities（MBS)
貸款欺詐 fraulent loans
次貸危機 Subprime mortgage crisis
⑶ 經濟危機英語作文
The recent upheaval in the financial sector has some people in a panic, most people bewildered, and others busy aiming their pointer fingers at whomever they think is guilty of doing something that contributed to this problem. The presidential candidates are in the latter category. They aren』t quite sure what to do or what to say, but that doesn』t stop them from saying something, anyway.
John McCain made a decisive statement, attempting to show leadership, but his statement was not a very smart one. Barack Obama, by contrast, simply blamed Republicans.
Few things are as simple as politicians make them seem in an election year. Political candidates succeed by issuing pointed statements that are easy to understand and that connect with voters; truth and accuracy are not the primary concerns.
The important thing right now is to figure out what actually happened in the financial sector, and fix things so it can』t happen again. We must ignore the tremendous amount of speculation about what 「might」 happen, and the doom and gloom soothsayers who tell us that the sky is falling or that the end of the world draweth nye.
Because of its complexity the current financial situation invites simple political messages that connect with voters; it does not lend itself to full explanations that illuminate.
So, when Sen. Obama says that 「it』s the Republicans』 fault,」 he is expressing a simple idea that a lot of people buy into, but doesn』t explain anything. It is a silly oversimplification unworthy of a man who would be President. It appeals to emotional prejudices and ignores inconvenient realities, and most important of all, it is just plain wrong.
When Sen. McCain suggested that Securities and Exchange Commission head Christopher Cox didn』t do his job, and if he were president he would fire Mr. Cox, the Senator didn』t offer specifics. We』ll know more about Mr. Cox』s role as time passes and we learn more of the details, and can then judge if Mr. McCain』s simple message to voters about firing Chris Cox was a proper evaluation of the situation.
Sen. Obama described the current agony as "the most serious financial crisis since the Great Depression,」 ignoring all the recessions since then, even the ones in the 80s and the one following the 9-11 attacks, both arguably more serious crises. Of course, it remains to be seen just how serious this problem will ultimately be, but given Mr. Obama』s abysmal understanding of things economic, we would do well to take his prognostications with a grain of salt.
The root of this problem is the housing market』s subprime loan crisis. A subprime loan is a loan made to someone who under normal circumstances would not qualify for a loan, based upon their income and their ability to make payments. That begs the question: Why would a bank make a loan to someone it believes is unable to make the payments?
The Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) was given life ring the Carter administration, and empowers four federal financial supervisory agencies to oversee the performance of financial institutions in meeting the credit needs of their entire community, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods. Whenever an institution wants to make virtually any change in its business operation, such as merging, opening up a new branch, or getting into a new line of business, it must first prove to regulators that it has made ample loans to the government's preferred borrowers, those in low- and middle-income neighborhoods who normally would not qualify for a loan. Lenders with low ratings can be fined by the government.
The Carter administration used tax dollars to fund numerous "community groups" that helped the government enforce the CRA by filing petitions against banks whose 「cooperativeness」 didn』t measure up, and sometimes stopping their efforts to expand their operations. Banks responded by giving money to the community groups and by making more loans. One of those organizations was the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN). An active associate of ACORN in the 90s was a young public-interest attorney named Barack Obama.
So, starting in 1977 the federal government began 「encouraging」—perhaps 「strong-arming」 is a more accurate term—banks to make loans to people to whom they normally would not make a loan, and in 1995 the Clinton administration pushed through revisions to the CRA that substantially increased the number and amount of these loans.
All of the bad loans weren』t caused by the CRA, of course, but billions of dollars in CRA loans did go bad, as should have been expected. When Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac came along and made it possible for banks to escape the risk associated with these ill-advised loans, conditions were just right for a large portion of the banking instry, even institutions that did not fall under the CRA, to become involved in making loans to unqualified borrowers, and banks participated in big numbers.
The federal government』s fingerprints are all over this crisis, and the Democrats who are today so righteously indignant and blaming the administration are at least as guilty as the Republicans.
James H. Shott, a resident of Bluefield, Va., is a Bluefield Daily Telegraph columnist. He blogs at Observations
⑷ 「經濟危機」用英語怎麼講
economy crisis
⑸ 求有關經濟危機的英語作文
What is the reason for the US economic crisis?
The Mortgage problem is the result of corporate greed run amuck. And the damage caused in the '90s by changing banking regualtions is small change compared to the fleecing of the middle class with the tax code. That's why they can't pay a mortgage.
See: How has the Income Tax contributed to the economic crisis of 2008?
and: What is the main cause of the current economic crisis in the US?
Answer:
Basically what happened is that in the late 1990s the Republican Congress did away with a lot of regulations in the financial instry that had been put in place in the 1930s ring the Great Depression. Without these regulations, it became easier for a lot of questionable banking and lending practices to take place. Lenders started making money by giving out mortgages to people they knew or should have known could not actually afford the houses they were buying; the lenders assumed that housing prices would continue to rise, so in the case of foreclosure the lender would still make money.
Millions of people ended up in these kinds of mortgages, called subprime mortgages; knowingly or not, these people ended up not being able to repay their mortgages. At the same time, housing prices started to fall. So imagine this: you buy a $500,000 house with mortgage of $475,000 and a down payment of $25,000. With the initial interest rate, your mortgage payment each month was only $400. But then interest rates rose (and these people had mortgages with adjustable, instead of fixed, rates on them), and so your payments went up to $600 or $800. The problem is you don't have enough income to pay that each month, so you can't afford to make your mortgage payments. Meanwhile, the value of your house falls to $400,000. That means that, even if you sell your house, you will still owe the $100,000 difference. The result of this is that people in this situation go bankrupt, and the lender ends up owning the house.
This problem has happened millions of times in the U.S. but also in other countries where the same lax practices were taking place, e.g. Spain, Canada, the U.K., etc.
Answer
Lenders that gave out too many mortgages of this type then found themselves having a lot of people not be able to pay back their mortgages. The lender then ends up with the foreclosed house, but it can't sell the house for very much because housing prices are falling. This means that the lender has lost a LOT of money on the one house. If banks loose $200,000 on a million homes, that's already $2 billion in lost money.
This is all simplified, of course.
Answer
The other problem is that these mortgages were being bundled into investment opportunities that companies like Lehman Brothers and other companies then sold shares in to investors. All these people are now also loosing their money.
The results are that bank in trouble don't have enough assets to stay in business; the problem is so massive that only government l-outs can keep the banks in business. Because so many banks have so many bad mortgages, which are a kind of loan, so they have bad loans, it's hard for any bank to offer credit/loans for any reason right now--they just don't have enough cash to cover everything.
The problem then turns to businesses: small businesses rely on credit to expand, make payroll, etc., and without credit business starts to shrink, jobs are lost, and the economy overall tanks because no one can get any credit at all, so the economy is being forced to switch to a cash economy: if you don't have the money already, you can't buy anything.
Answer
The fundamental reason: Financial Leverage was misused to manipulate markets for decades. Organizations were never regulated and compelled to hire more ethical traders and managers rather than B-School MBA Grads who have just learned to make money at any cost. US officials while rescuing the global giants claim it is just a real estate correction e to bad debts in banking system. Whatever the case, the market sentiment have changed forever, and valuations will come under immense pressure from now on...be it real estate, equity, debt, bond, procts, services, or...anything
A man jumping from top floor out of a 100 storey building can feel flying with joy until his reaches the ground floor with a big bang. This is the case with most inflated companies and their greedy management, we only know when they actually burst. We should watch and regulate them starting from their intention to climb that building from ground zero!
Some Food for Thought: The golden rule is "do not expect the market to behave and act for your profit". They are playing for their own profit. Win-Win is only a term used to convince or ince not-so-smart investors. There will still be a bunch of guys who have profited from these crashes. After all, nobody is throwing money into the Atlantic Ocean, if you lose someone else gains. Unfortunately, incentives for playing smart (mostly doing bad) are huge and accepted by legal systems, regulators, government and modern society at large.
以上的信息來自網站http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_reason_for_the_US_economic_crisis
另外我還找到了一些新聞評論，標題是What are real reasons for the financial crisis?
（When Senator Obama says the current financial debacle is "the Republicans' fault" he is expressing a simple idea that doesn't explain anything. But when Senator McCain blamed the SEC, he didn't offer specifics.） 應該是很權威的人吧，寫論文和做演示文稿時你應該用的上，內容是：
The recent upheaval in the financial sector has some people in a panic, most people bewildered, and others busy aiming their pointer fingers at whomever they think is guilty of doing something that contributed to this problem. The presidential candidates are in the latter category. They aren』t quite sure what to do or what to say, but that doesn』t stop them from saying something, anyway.
John McCain made a decisive statement, attempting to show leadership, but his statement was not a very smart one. Barack Obama, by contrast, simply blamed Republicans.
Few things are as simple as politicians make them seem in an election year. Political candidates succeed by issuing pointed statements that are easy to understand and that connect with voters; truth and accuracy are not the primary concerns.
The important thing right now is to figure out what actually happened in the financial sector, and fix things so it can』t happen again. We must ignore the tremendous amount of speculation about what 「might」 happen, and the doom and gloom soothsayers who tell us that the sky is falling or that the end of the world draweth nye.
Because of its complexity the current financial situation invites simple political messages that connect with voters; it does not lend itself to full explanations that illuminate.
So, when Sen. Obama says that 「it』s the Republicans』 fault,」 he is expressing a simple idea that a lot of people buy into, but doesn』t explain anything. It is a silly oversimplification unworthy of a man who would be President. It appeals to emotional prejudices and ignores inconvenient realities, and most important of all, it is just plain wrong.
When Sen. McCain suggested that Securities and Exchange Commission head Christopher Cox didn』t do his job, and if he were president he would fire Mr. Cox, the Senator didn』t offer specifics. We』ll know more about Mr. Cox』s role as time passes and we learn more of the details, and can then judge if Mr. McCain』s simple message to voters about firing Chris Cox was a proper evaluation of the situation.
Sen. Obama described the current agony as "the most serious financial crisis since the Great Depression,」 ignoring all the recessions since then, even the ones in the 80s and the one following the 9-11 attacks, both arguably more serious crises. Of course, it remains to be seen just how serious this problem will ultimately be, but given Mr. Obama』s abysmal understanding of things economic, we would do well to take his prognostications with a grain of salt.
The root of this problem is the housing market』s subprime loan crisis. A subprime loan is a loan made to someone who under normal circumstances would not qualify for a loan, based upon their income and their ability to make payments. That begs the question: Why would a bank make a loan to someone it believes is unable to make the payments?
The Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) was given life ring the Carter administration, and empowers four federal financial supervisory agencies to oversee the performance of financial institutions in meeting the credit needs of their entire community, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods. Whenever an institution wants to make virtually any change in its business operation, such as merging, opening up a new branch, or getting into a new line of business, it must first prove to regulators that it has made ample loans to the government's preferred borrowers, those in low- and middle-income neighborhoods who normally would not qualify for a loan. Lenders with low ratings can be fined by the government.
The Carter administration used tax dollars to fund numerous "community groups" that helped the government enforce the CRA by filing petitions against banks whose 「cooperativeness」 didn』t measure up, and sometimes stopping their efforts to expand their operations. Banks responded by giving money to the community groups and by making more loans. One of those organizations was the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN). An active associate of ACORN in the 90s was a young public-interest attorney named Barack Obama.
So, starting in 1977 the federal government began 「encouraging」—perhaps 「strong-arming」 is a more accurate term—banks to make loans to people to whom they normally would not make a loan, and in 1995 the Clinton administration pushed through revisions to the CRA that substantially increased the number and amount of these loans.
All of the bad loans weren』t caused by the CRA, of course, but billions of dollars in CRA loans did go bad, as should have been expected. When Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac came along and made it possible for banks to escape the risk associated with these ill-advised loans, conditions were just right for a large portion of the banking instry, even institutions that did not fall under the CRA, to become involved in making loans to unqualified borrowers, and banks participated in big numbers.
The federal government』s fingerprints are all over this crisis, and the Democrats who are today so righteously indignant and blaming the administration are at least as guilty as the Republicans.
James H. Shott, a resident of Bluefield, Va., is a Bluefield Daily Telegraph columnist. He blogs at Observations.
來源網址是：http://www.speroforum.com/site/article.asp?id=16208&t=What+are++real+reasons+for+the+financial+crisis%3F
在google里可以找到很多關於
U.S. economic crisis reasons的信息，只是很雜很亂，需要辨認，你如果需要更多資料的話不妨自己找找看或者再聯系我。
⑹ 「經濟危機」用英語怎麼說
是economic crisis ，我們可以互相交流喔
⑺ 1929―1933的美國經濟危機 用英文簡單說下
The Great Depression began on "Black Tuesday" with the Wall Street Crash of October, 1929 and rapidly spread worldwide. The market crash marked the beginning of a decade of high unemployment, poverty, low profits, deflation, plunging farm incomes, and lost opportunities for economic growth and personal advancement. Although its causes are still uncertain and controversial, the net effect was a sudden and general loss of confidence in the economic future. The usual explanations include numerous factors, especially high consumer debt, ill-regulated markets that permitted malfeasance by banks and investors, cutbacks in foreign trade, lack of high-growth new instries, and growing wealth inequality, all interacting to create a downward economic spiral of reced spending, falling confidence, and lowered proction.
The initial government response to the crisis exacerbated the situation; protectionist policies like the 1930 Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act in the U.S. strangled global trade as other nations retaliated against the U.S.[citation needed] Instries that suffered the most included agriculture, mining, and logging as well as rable goods like construction and automobiles that people postponed.The economy eventually recovered from the low point of the winter of 1932-33, with sustained improvement until 1937, when the Recession of 1937 brought back 1934 levels of unemployment.
⑻ 「後經濟危機時期」用英文怎麼翻譯
經濟危機 crisis
後經濟危機 post-crisis
後經濟危機時期
post-crisis era
⑼ 經濟危機的英語翻譯是什麼
經濟危機
economic crisis
例：On the New Features of World Econonic Crises
世界經濟危機新特點研究
Economic Crisis and the Study of Early-Warning Index System
經濟危機及其預警指標體系研究
Argentina's Economic Crisis and Setbacks in Globalization
阿根專廷經濟危機與屬全球化遭遇挫折
The crisis theory and macroeconomic policy
經濟危機理論與我國宏觀經濟政策選擇
⑽ 經濟危機的英文怎麼表達
經濟危機，一來般新聞自里的播報，以及日常生活中口語化一點都是用的econmic crisis
給你一個例句，供你參考一下：
During the recent econmic crisis, many businessmen went broke.
最近這次經濟危機期間，許多商人破產了。
The factory has to decrease proction since the economic crisis.
自從經濟危機以來，工廠不得不減少生產。