英语阅读真题

① 英语阅读题

选b，
A，仅根据第四段，看不出她看到了被污染的水资源和越来越少的鱼。According to Paragraph 4，表示你的信息只能是第四段的事实，不是推测，也不是前面描写的内容。

C，她探索了海域，保护了海洋。第四段并没有描述到她采取的具体措施来保护海洋。而且上一段还明显写了They want to know how to protect the ocean, and how to restore it to good health where damage has been done.

第四段仅告诉我们，Sylvia 关心海洋问题，但具体怎么做没写出来

② 英语题目阅读

16.第二个和第四个选项是细节，片面的，不能完全概括文章大意。第三个选项与文章中的意思相反。所以排除这三个，第一个选项是正确的。

17.根据第二段第二行，第二个选项是正确的。
18.根据第二段最后两行，第三个选项正确。
19.根据最后一段第二第三行，第四个选项正确。
20.根据第三段的第一行和第二行，第一个选项正确。

③ 英语阅读题

1.are liable to接着、随后
2.in favor of 对....有利
3.is bound to 会发生、易于.....
4.speculate about思考
5.invested with把....授于、赋于....特质

6.stand up for支持、坚持
7.in the form of以....形式存在

8.prepared for准备
9.in the company of 和…在一起; 偕; 偕同;
10.in succession连续走过了20个村庄
答案保证正确。答案的序号是按题目序号。这些提问的序号和空格上的序号有些混乱。

④ 考研英语真题：阅读理解

考研英语真题：阅读理解

Text 1

A group of labour MPs, among them Yvette Cooper, are bringing in the new year with a call to institute a UK "town of culture" award. The proposal is that it should sit alongside the existing city of culture title, which was held by Hull in 2017 and has been awarded to Coventry for zozl. Cooper and her colleagues argue that the success of the crown for Hull, where it brought in E220m of investment and an avalache of arts, out not to be confined to cities. Britain' town, it is true are not prevented from applying, but they generally lack the resources to put together a bit to beat their bigger competitions. A town of culture award could, it is argued, become an annual event, attracting funding and creating jobs.

Some might see the proposal as a boo by prize for the fact that Britain is no longer be able to apply for the much more prestigious title of European capital of culture, a sought-after award bagged by Glasgow in 1990 and Livorpool in 2008. A cynic might speculate that the UK is on the verge of disappearing into an endless fever of self-celebration in its desperation to reinvent itself for, the post-Brexit world: after town of culture, who knows that will follow- village of culture ? Suburb of culture? Hamlet of culture?

It is also wise to recall that such titles are not a cure-all. A badly run "year of culture" washes in and out of a place like the tide, bringing prominence for a spell but leaving no lasting benefits to the community . The really successful holders of such titles are those that do a great deal more than fill hotel bedrooms and bring in high-profile arts events and good press for a year. They transform the aspirations of the people who live there; they nudge the self image of the city into a bolder and more optimistic light.

It is hard to get right, and requires a remarkable degree of vision, as well as cooperation between city authorities, the private sector, community groups and cultural organizations. But it can be done : Glasgow' s year as European capital of culture can certainly be seen as one of complex series of factors that have turned the city into the power of art, music and theatre that it remains today.

A "town of culture" could be not just about the arts but about honouring a town's

peculiarities-helping sustain its high street, supporting local facilities and above all celebrating its people and turn it into action.

21. Cooper and her colleagues argue that a "town of culture" award could________

[A] consolidate the town-city ties in Britain.

[B] promote cooperation among Britain's towns.

[C] increase the economic strength of Britain's towns.

[D] focus Britain's limited resources on cultural events.

22. According to Paragraph 2, the proposal might be regarded by some as________

[A] a sensible compromise.

[B] a self-deceiving attempt.

[C] an eye-catching bonus.

[D] an inaccessible target.

23. The author suggests that a title holder is successful only if it________

[A] endeavours to maintain its image.

[B] meets the aspirations of its people.

[C] brings its local arts to prominence.

D] commits to its long-term growth.

24. Glasgow is mentioned in Paragraph 3 to present________

[A] a contrasting case.

[B] a supporting example.

[C] a background story,

[D] a related topic.

25. What is the author's attitude towards the proposal ?

[A] Skeptical

[B] Objective

[C] Favourable

[D] Critical

Text 2

Scientific publishing has long been a licence to print money. Scientists need joumals in which to publish

their research, so they will supply the articles without monetary reward. Other scientists perform the specialised work of peer review also for free, because it is a central element in the acquisition of status and the proction of scientific knowledge.

With the content of papers secured for free, the publisher needs only fnd a market for its journal. Until this century, university libraries were not very price sensitive. Scientific publishers routinely report profit margins approaching 40% on their operations, at a time when the rest of the publishing instry is in an existential crisis.

The Dutch giant Elsevier, which claims to publish 25% of the scientific papers proced in the world,made profits of more than £900m last year, while UK universities alone spent more than £210m in 2016 toenable researchers to access their own publicly funded research; both figures seem to rise unstoppably despite increasingly desperate efforts to change them.

The most drastic, and thoroughly illegal, reaction has been the emergence of Sci-Hub, a kind of global photocopier for scientific papers, set up in 2012, which now claims to offer access to every paywalled article published since 2015. The success of Sci-Hub, which relies on researchers passing on copies they have themselves legally accessed, shows the legal ecosystem has lost legitimacy among its users and must be transformed so that it works for all participants.

In Britain the move towards open access publishing has been driven by funding bodies. In some ways it has been very successful. More than half of all British scientific research is now published under open access terms: either freely available from the moment of publication, or paywalled for a year or more so that the publishers can make a profit before being placed on general release.

Yet the new system has not worked out any cheaper for the universities. Publishers have responded to the demand that they make their proct free to readers by charging their writers fees to cover the costs of preparing an article. These range from around ￡500 to $5,000. A report last year pointed out that the costs both of subscriptions and of these’’article preparation costs’’ had been steadily rising at a rate above inflation. In some ways the scientific publishing model resembles the economy of the social internet: labour is provided free in exchange for the hope of status, while huge profits are made by a few big firms who run the market places. In both cases, we need a rebalancing of power.

26. Scientific publishing is seen as“a licence to print money" partly because________

[A] its funding has enjoyed a steady increase .

[B] its marketing strategy has been successful.

[C] its payment for peer review is reced.

[D] its content acquisition costs nothing.

27. According to Paragraphs 2 and 3, scientific publishers Elsevier have________

[A] thrived mainly on university libraries.

[B] gone through an existential crisis.

[C] revived the publishing instry.

[D] financed researchers generously.

28. How does the author feel about the success of Sci-Hub?

[A] Relieved.

[B] Puzzled.

[C] Concerned

[D] Encouraged.

29. It can be learned from Paragraphs 5 and 6 that open access terms________

[A]allow publishers some room to make money.

[B] render publishing much easier for scientists.

[C] rece the cost of publication substantially.

[D] free universities from financial burdens.

30. Which of the following characterises the scientific publishing model?

[A] Trial subscription is offered.

[B] Labour triumphs over status.

[C] Costs are well controlled.

D] The few feed on the many.

Text 3

Progressives often support diversity mandates as a path to equality and a way to level the playing field. But all too often such policies are an insincere form of virtue-signaling that benefits only the most privileged and does little to help average people.

A pair of bills sponsored by Massachusetts state Senator Jason Lewis and House Speaker Pro Tempore Patricia Haddad, to ensure "gender parity" on boards and commissions, provide a case in point.

Haddad and Lewis are concerned that more than half the state-government boards are less than 40 percent female. In order to ensure that elite women have more such opportunities, they have proposed imposing government quotas. If the bills become law, state boards and commissions will be required to set aside 50 percent of board seats for women by 2022.

The bills are similar to a measure recently adopted in Califomia, which last year became the first state to require gender quotas for private companies. In signing the measure, California Governor Jerry Brown admitted that the law, which expressly classifies people on the basis of sex, is probably unconstitutional.

The US Supreme Court frowns on sex-based classifications unless they are designed to address an "important" policy interest, Because the California law applies to all boards, even where there is no history of prior discrimination, courts are likely to rule that the law violates the constitutional guarantee of "equal protection".

But are such government mandates even necessary? Female participation on corporate boards may not currently mirror the pereentage of women in the general population, but so what?

The number of women on corporate boards has been steadily increasing without government interference. According to a study by Catalyst, between 2010 and 2015 the share of women on the boards of global corporations increased by 54 percent.

Requiring companies to make gender the primary qualification for board membership will inevitably lead to less experienced private sector boards. That is exactly what happened when Norway adopted a nationwide corporate gender quota.

Wrting in The New Republic, Alice Lee notes that increasing the number of opportunities for board membership without increasing the pool of qualified women to serve on such boards has led to a"golden skirt "phenomenon, where the same clite women scoop up multiple seats on a variety of boards.

Next time somebody pushes corporate quotas as a way to promote gender equity, remember that such policies are largely self-serving measures that make their sponsors feel good but do litle to help average women.

31. The author believes that the bills sponsored by Lewis and Haddad wills________

[A] help little to rece gender bias.

[B] pose a threat to the state government.

[C] raise women's position in politics.

[D] greatly broaden career options.

32. Which of the following is true of the California measure?

[A] It has irritated private business owners.

[B] It is welcomed by the Supreme Court,

[C] It may go against the Constitution.

[D] It will settle the prior controversies.

33. The author mentions the study by Catalyst to ilustrate____

[A] the harm from arbitrary board decision.

[B] the importance of constitutional guaranees.

[C] the pressure on women in global corporations.

[D] the needlessness of government interventions.

34. Norway's adoption of a nationwide corporate gender quota has led to____

[A] the underestimation of elite women's role.

[B] the objection to female participation on boards.

[C] the entry of unqualified candidates into the board.

[D] the growing tension between labor and management.

35. Which of the following can be inferred from the text?

[A] Women's need in employment should be considered.

[B] Feasibility should be a prime concern in policymaking.

[C] Everyone should try hard to promote social justice.

[D] Major social issues should be the focus of legislation.

Text 4

Last Thursday, the French Senate passed a digital services tax, which would impose an entirely new tax

on large multinationals that provide digital services to consumers or users in France. Digital services include everything from providing a platform for selling goods and services online to targeting advertising based on user data, and the tax applies to gross revenue from such servces. Many French politicians and media outlets have referred to this as a“GAFA tax," meaning that it is designed to apply primarily to companies such as Google, Apple, Facebook and Amazon- in other words, multiational tech companies based in the United States.

The digital services tax now awaits the signature of President Emmanuel Macron, who has expressed support for the measure, and it could go into effect within the next few weeks. But it has already sparked significant controversy, with the Unite Sates trade representative opening an investigation into whether the tax discriminates against American companies, which in turn could lead to trade sanctions against France.

The French tax is not just a unilateral move by one country in need of revenue. Instead, the digital services tax is part of a much larger trend, with countries over the past few years proposing or putting in place an alphabet soup of new international tax provisions. These have included Britain's DPT (diverted profits tax), Australia's MAAL (multinational antiavoidance law), and India's SEP (significant economic presence) test, to name but a few. At the same time, the European Union, Spain, Britain and several other countries have all seriously contemplated digital services taxes.

These unilateral developments differ in their specifics, but they are all designed to tax multinationals on income and revenue that countries believe they should have a right to tax, even if international tax rules do not grant them that right. In other words, they all share a view that the international tax system has failed to keep ;up with the current economy.

In response to these many unilateral measures, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) is currently working with 131 countries to reach a consensus by the end of 2020 on an international solution. Both France and the United States are involved in the organization' s work, but France's digital services tax and the American response raise questions about what the future holds for the international tax system.

France‘s planned tax is a clear warning: Unless a broad consensus can be reached on reforming the international tax system, other nations are likely to follow suit, and American companies will face a cascade of different taxes from dozens of nations that will prove burdensome and costly.

36. The French Senate has passed a bill to_____

[A] regulate digital services platforms.

[B] protect French companies' interests .

[C] impose a levy on tech multinationals.

[D] curb the influence of advertising.

37. It can be learned from Paragraph 2 that the digital services tax _____

[A] may trigger countermeasures against France.

[B] is apt to arouse criticism at home and abroad.

[C] aims to ease international trade tensions.

[D] will prompt the tech giants to quit France.

38. The countries adopting the unilateral measures share the opinion that _____

[A] redistribution of tech giants' revenue must be ensured.

[B] the current international tax system needs upgrading.

[C] tech multinationals' monopoly should be prevented.

[D] all countries ought to enjoy equal taxing rights.

39. It can be learned from Para 5 that the OECO's current work_____

[A] is being resisted by US companies.

[B] needs to be readjusted immediately.

[C] is faced with uncertain prospects.

[D] needs to in involve more countries.

40. Which of the following might be the. best title for this text?

[A] France Is Confronted with Trade Sanctions

[B] France leads the charge on Digital Tax

[C] France Says "NO" to Tech Multinationals

[D] France Demands a Role in the Digital Economy

考研英语真题：阅读理解的内容小编就说到这里了，更多关于考研备考技巧，报名入口，报名时间，考研成绩查询，报名费用，准考证打印入口及时间等问题，小编会及时更新。希望各位考生都能进入自己的理想考研院校。希望大家能好好复习。取得佳绩。

⑤ 2019年MBA考试英语阅读理解真题及答案

MBA联考英语真题试题及解析

链接：

若资源有问题欢迎追问~

⑥ 英语阅读理解答案

阅读。

对于阅读来说，一定要先听课，不然你找不到规律受打击的，我先听了天道考研鱼姐的阅读理解课，报名可以找红侠老师的，还给了我优惠券呢。对于阅读真题永远是第一位的。英语二主要是2010改革之后才出现，但是前面几年的英语一的真题也要做。我是从2月份开始做的，从1998年一直做到2016的英语一真题，再从2010年开始做到2017年的英语二真题。对于20考研的同学们来说，真题从2000年做就可以了，一直到2018年，大概有十几套，足够你研究好几个月了。

首先我谈下参考用书，我的英语资料大部分是在上一届考研之后从学姐那里买的，还有一些是学校图书馆清理杂物时我捡的。当时秉持的是能省一点就省一点的想法，后来发现，不能顾此失彼，适当地省钱很重要，但是时间一定更重要。一般来说，大家都会选择张剑的黄皮书，这也是考研英语的标配了。

其次，我分享下自己做真题的具体步骤。真题只做一遍是不够的，也不能为求遍数而盲目地刷很多遍的真题，每做一遍，就要奔着每一次的目标，同时要总结每一次的收获，这样刷题才有意义。最近学到一句话“减肥，不能紧盯着体重计上的数字”，同样，对于真题中的阅读，也不能紧盯着你的正确率。

第一遍做真题阅读，目的是“没有一个单词不认识，没有一个句子看不懂”。我主要是计时15分钟做完一篇阅读及题目，对下答案，对自己的正确率心里有个数，然后全文翻译，一定要写下来，把翻译不正确的句子和单词拿出来反复记诵。第一遍的时候我从不纠结于错了多少，但是我确实需要第一遍的正确率来做一下参考数值，这样好与后面第二遍第三遍做的正确率想比照，看看自己是否真的有长进。这样不断地做题、翻译、背诵，基本上可以对十几套真题有个比较深刻的了解。在不断地做题时我也发现第我一遍的正确率稳定在每篇错两个及以下这样。这样的一个工程量耗时很久，且很需要耐心，也是整个考研英语复习过程中最重要的事情。此时你不需要跟别人比较速度和做题量，每天下午选择一篇阅读进行这样一套流程，尽量不要间断，这样跟英语建立起亲切友好的伙伴关系就好。

第二遍做真题阅读，目的是总结出题规律，掌握答题技巧。这一遍因为已经有了以前的功底，可以说理解文章大意已经不难了，这时候可以把重心转向题目上。阅读的题目类型无非就是细节题、词汇题等几类，天道考研的讲义里面老师都总结了。这个时候你再一遍做题时，一方面是看你之前背过的句子和单词有哪些已经遗忘了，或是有哪些以前认识的现在不认识了，另一方面是总结归纳你错的题目主要是哪些类型，以及你错的原因是什么，自己进行一个总结，并且针对不同的题型以及你常出错的原因做出相应的措施，寻找一些答题的技巧，这个阶段可以多借助真题的答案解析。这个归纳总结的过程希望你们可以自己做，网课教你的是方法，但是还是靠自己学的。有余力的情况下，你还可以根据文章内容总结下文章的段落大意、文章的行文框架、文章的体裁等，这对于掌握答题技巧都很有帮助。

第三遍做阅读，目的是练习速度。比如以前你是一篇一篇做，现在就可以合起来，一次做四到六篇（包括新题型、完型），计算下你的时间，根据你的速度来做一些调整。须知，在考试的时候，时间不够也是很常出现的情况。到后期的时候，可以留一到两套卷子用作模拟考试。因为考试的时候你碰到的卷子是全新的，并不是你现在做了很多遍的真题，所以需要锻炼下自己对陌生卷子的心里承受能力。我在11月底的时候有用2016年卷子全真模拟了下，很客观的给自己算分，大概是80分左右，最后跟我的考试成绩也差不多。

第四遍，目的是保持手感。在进行第四遍的时候，基本上已经是11月-12月左右，这个时候政治和专业课还有英语作文的压力都非常大，所以英语真题我是每天做两篇，保持手感就好。

⑦ 英语阅读理解题：

47 D 主要原因在于孩子的父亲也就是穿黑色外套的男人抢了医生的车 耽误了两个多小时。他父亲不知道是就他孩子的医生。
48 D 我想孩子的父亲抢车不是为了占为己有，是为了救他的孩子，要快点到医院吧

⑧ 英语阅读理解题

1泊分の场合は、空を见て何かを移动して、あなたが辉く前に见たことがない、それは彗星（コメット）见えるかもしれない。
彗星は星のように见えます。惑星と同様に、彗星は独自の光をしている。同社は、 （反射）を反映して辉く太阳の光から、地球と同様に、彗星は太阳のラウンドは、はるかに长いパスになるが、 （轨道）よりも、地球の旅。
彗星は星ではない场合は、それは何ですか？
一部の科学者たちは、彗星の大部分は水の氷の破片に冻っていると考えて鉄や岩のちりと、おそらくいくつかの大きな岩の破片を混ぜた场合は太阳の光（ ）は、彗星の氷を溶かす溶け、ガス云の大移动终了した后、后続。これらの云は、一绪にほこり、长い尾を形成する。
私たちのために、おそらく多くの人々は彗星を见ている。しかし谁もが知っている方法を、多くの彗星が、彗星の何百万、数することができるだけ近くなるだけ。
英国エドモンドハレーは、 1656から1742に住んで、彗星の姿を通じ、 sky.Some彗星の外に移动することがback.Othersを取るのパスについて多くを定期的にいつでも戻ってくるという名前を発见し、この巨大な彗星これは、ハレー彗星にちなんで命名された彼が戻ってきて、一人がそれを皆さんagain.Maybeハレーの彗星が来るのかを见て、太阳に近いため、付属の地上にいた1年の最后の时间1986.Then世界中の人々が夜に外を见ていた。あなたはおそらく、地球の近くに来るハレーの彗星を再度确认することができます。
1.A彗星ですlike______
地球A.sun B.moon C.sunlight D.the
彗星の大部分です2.A _____
A.waterとロック
氷の块にB.water冻结と鉄との混合
C.ice 、鉄や岩のほこり
D.only岩のいくつかの大きな作品
多くの人々 3.Maybe _____
A.haven 'トンを见た彗星は彗星のすべてのB.have
彗星を见たC.have D.have昼间に彗星を见た
彗星4.Someてくるbak_______
D.at A.atいつでもB.at正午C.at正规回昼间
5.Halley '彗星秒だったback______
A.in 1990 B.in 1980 C.in 1986 D.in 1989
如果你看看天空的一个晚上，并看到一些移动和光辉你从未有过的，它可能是一颗彗星（彗星） 。
彗星有时看起来像明星。就像一个地球，彗星并没有根据自己。它的阳光照耀它反映（反射） 。与地球一样，彗星不用一轮太阳，但在更长的道路（轨道）比地球的旅行。
如果一个彗星不是一个明星，它是什么呢？
一些科学家认为，有很大一部分是彗星水冻结成块的冰和混合铁和岩尘，也许几大块的岩石。当阳光融化（融化）的冰彗星，伟大的气体云去落后之后。这些云彩，连同灰尘，形成长长的尾巴。
许多人也许已经看到了彗星。但是没有人知道有多少彗星有。可能会有数以百万计的彗星，但只有少数接近足以让我们看到。
一个英国人任命何厚铧哈雷，谁住1656年至1742年，发现了许多关于彗星的路径，采取通过sky.Some彗星搬出我们的视线，并从未back.Others回来定期倍。一个大的彗星，让回来后，被任命为哈雷因为他是一个谁出什么时候会回来again.Maybe您所见过的哈雷慧星，因为它是最后一次来到靠近太阳和地球是在一年1986.Then世界各地的人以外，晚上看看它。您可能能够看到哈雷慧星时候再次接近地球。
简彗星是like______
A.sun B.moon C.sunlight D.the地球
2.A很大一部分彗星是_____
A.water和摇滚
B.water冻结成块的冰和混合铁
C.ice ，铁和岩尘
D.only几大块岩石
3.Maybe许多人_____
A.haven '吨看到任何彗星B.have看到彗星
C.have看到彗星在白天看到一颗彗星D.have
4.Some彗星保持未来bak_______
A.at任何时候B.at中午C.at白天经常倍D.at
5.Halley的彗星来到back______
A.in 1990年B.in 1980年C.in 1986年D.in 1989年
1.D
2.C
3.D
4.C
5.C