英語閱讀真題

① 英語閱讀題

選b，
A，僅根據第四段，看不出她看到了被污染的水資源和越來越少的魚。According to Paragraph 4，表示你的信息只能是第四段的事實，不是推測，也不是前面描寫的內容。

C，她探索了海域，保護了海洋。第四段並沒有描述到她採取的具體措施來保護海洋。而且上一段還明顯寫了They want to know how to protect the ocean, and how to restore it to good health where damage has been done.

第四段僅告訴我們，Sylvia 關心海洋問題，但具體怎麼做沒寫出來

② 英語題目閱讀

16.第二個和第四個選項是細節，片面的，不能完全概括文章大意。第三個選項與文章中的意思相反。所以排除這三個，第一個選項是正確的。

17.根據第二段第二行，第二個選項是正確的。
18.根據第二段最後兩行，第三個選項正確。
19.根據最後一段第二第三行，第四個選項正確。
20.根據第三段的第一行和第二行，第一個選項正確。

③ 英語閱讀題

1.are liable to接著、隨後
2.in favor of 對....有利
3.is bound to 會發生、易於.....
4.speculate about思考
5.invested with把....授於、賦於....特質

6.stand up for支持、堅持
7.in the form of以....形式存在

8.prepared for准備
9.in the company of 和…在一起; 偕; 偕同;
10.in succession連續走過了20個村莊
答案保證正確。答案的序號是按題目序號。這些提問的序號和空格上的序號有些混亂。

④ 考研英語真題：閱讀理解

考研英語真題：閱讀理解

Text 1

A group of labour MPs, among them Yvette Cooper, are bringing in the new year with a call to institute a UK "town of culture" award. The proposal is that it should sit alongside the existing city of culture title, which was held by Hull in 2017 and has been awarded to Coventry for zozl. Cooper and her colleagues argue that the success of the crown for Hull, where it brought in E220m of investment and an avalache of arts, out not to be confined to cities. Britain' town, it is true are not prevented from applying, but they generally lack the resources to put together a bit to beat their bigger competitions. A town of culture award could, it is argued, become an annual event, attracting funding and creating jobs.

Some might see the proposal as a boo by prize for the fact that Britain is no longer be able to apply for the much more prestigious title of European capital of culture, a sought-after award bagged by Glasgow in 1990 and Livorpool in 2008. A cynic might speculate that the UK is on the verge of disappearing into an endless fever of self-celebration in its desperation to reinvent itself for, the post-Brexit world: after town of culture, who knows that will follow- village of culture ? Suburb of culture? Hamlet of culture?

It is also wise to recall that such titles are not a cure-all. A badly run "year of culture" washes in and out of a place like the tide, bringing prominence for a spell but leaving no lasting benefits to the community . The really successful holders of such titles are those that do a great deal more than fill hotel bedrooms and bring in high-profile arts events and good press for a year. They transform the aspirations of the people who live there; they nudge the self image of the city into a bolder and more optimistic light.

It is hard to get right, and requires a remarkable degree of vision, as well as cooperation between city authorities, the private sector, community groups and cultural organizations. But it can be done : Glasgow' s year as European capital of culture can certainly be seen as one of complex series of factors that have turned the city into the power of art, music and theatre that it remains today.

A "town of culture" could be not just about the arts but about honouring a town's

peculiarities-helping sustain its high street, supporting local facilities and above all celebrating its people and turn it into action.

21. Cooper and her colleagues argue that a "town of culture" award could________

[A] consolidate the town-city ties in Britain.

[B] promote cooperation among Britain's towns.

[C] increase the economic strength of Britain's towns.

[D] focus Britain's limited resources on cultural events.

22. According to Paragraph 2, the proposal might be regarded by some as________

[A] a sensible compromise.

[B] a self-deceiving attempt.

[C] an eye-catching bonus.

[D] an inaccessible target.

23. The author suggests that a title holder is successful only if it________

[A] endeavours to maintain its image.

[B] meets the aspirations of its people.

[C] brings its local arts to prominence.

D] commits to its long-term growth.

24. Glasgow is mentioned in Paragraph 3 to present________

[A] a contrasting case.

[B] a supporting example.

[C] a background story,

[D] a related topic.

25. What is the author's attitude towards the proposal ?

[A] Skeptical

[B] Objective

[C] Favourable

[D] Critical

Text 2

Scientific publishing has long been a licence to print money. Scientists need joumals in which to publish

their research, so they will supply the articles without monetary reward. Other scientists perform the specialised work of peer review also for free, because it is a central element in the acquisition of status and the proction of scientific knowledge.

With the content of papers secured for free, the publisher needs only fnd a market for its journal. Until this century, university libraries were not very price sensitive. Scientific publishers routinely report profit margins approaching 40% on their operations, at a time when the rest of the publishing instry is in an existential crisis.

The Dutch giant Elsevier, which claims to publish 25% of the scientific papers proced in the world,made profits of more than £900m last year, while UK universities alone spent more than £210m in 2016 toenable researchers to access their own publicly funded research; both figures seem to rise unstoppably despite increasingly desperate efforts to change them.

The most drastic, and thoroughly illegal, reaction has been the emergence of Sci-Hub, a kind of global photocopier for scientific papers, set up in 2012, which now claims to offer access to every paywalled article published since 2015. The success of Sci-Hub, which relies on researchers passing on copies they have themselves legally accessed, shows the legal ecosystem has lost legitimacy among its users and must be transformed so that it works for all participants.

In Britain the move towards open access publishing has been driven by funding bodies. In some ways it has been very successful. More than half of all British scientific research is now published under open access terms: either freely available from the moment of publication, or paywalled for a year or more so that the publishers can make a profit before being placed on general release.

Yet the new system has not worked out any cheaper for the universities. Publishers have responded to the demand that they make their proct free to readers by charging their writers fees to cover the costs of preparing an article. These range from around ￡500 to $5,000. A report last year pointed out that the costs both of subscriptions and of these’’article preparation costs’’ had been steadily rising at a rate above inflation. In some ways the scientific publishing model resembles the economy of the social internet: labour is provided free in exchange for the hope of status, while huge profits are made by a few big firms who run the market places. In both cases, we need a rebalancing of power.

26. Scientific publishing is seen as“a licence to print money" partly because________

[A] its funding has enjoyed a steady increase .

[B] its marketing strategy has been successful.

[C] its payment for peer review is reced.

[D] its content acquisition costs nothing.

27. According to Paragraphs 2 and 3, scientific publishers Elsevier have________

[A] thrived mainly on university libraries.

[B] gone through an existential crisis.

[C] revived the publishing instry.

[D] financed researchers generously.

28. How does the author feel about the success of Sci-Hub?

[A] Relieved.

[B] Puzzled.

[C] Concerned

[D] Encouraged.

29. It can be learned from Paragraphs 5 and 6 that open access terms________

[A]allow publishers some room to make money.

[B] render publishing much easier for scientists.

[C] rece the cost of publication substantially.

[D] free universities from financial burdens.

30. Which of the following characterises the scientific publishing model?

[A] Trial subscription is offered.

[B] Labour triumphs over status.

[C] Costs are well controlled.

D] The few feed on the many.

Text 3

Progressives often support diversity mandates as a path to equality and a way to level the playing field. But all too often such policies are an insincere form of virtue-signaling that benefits only the most privileged and does little to help average people.

A pair of bills sponsored by Massachusetts state Senator Jason Lewis and House Speaker Pro Tempore Patricia Haddad, to ensure "gender parity" on boards and commissions, provide a case in point.

Haddad and Lewis are concerned that more than half the state-government boards are less than 40 percent female. In order to ensure that elite women have more such opportunities, they have proposed imposing government quotas. If the bills become law, state boards and commissions will be required to set aside 50 percent of board seats for women by 2022.

The bills are similar to a measure recently adopted in Califomia, which last year became the first state to require gender quotas for private companies. In signing the measure, California Governor Jerry Brown admitted that the law, which expressly classifies people on the basis of sex, is probably unconstitutional.

The US Supreme Court frowns on sex-based classifications unless they are designed to address an "important" policy interest, Because the California law applies to all boards, even where there is no history of prior discrimination, courts are likely to rule that the law violates the constitutional guarantee of "equal protection".

But are such government mandates even necessary? Female participation on corporate boards may not currently mirror the pereentage of women in the general population, but so what?

The number of women on corporate boards has been steadily increasing without government interference. According to a study by Catalyst, between 2010 and 2015 the share of women on the boards of global corporations increased by 54 percent.

Requiring companies to make gender the primary qualification for board membership will inevitably lead to less experienced private sector boards. That is exactly what happened when Norway adopted a nationwide corporate gender quota.

Wrting in The New Republic, Alice Lee notes that increasing the number of opportunities for board membership without increasing the pool of qualified women to serve on such boards has led to a"golden skirt "phenomenon, where the same clite women scoop up multiple seats on a variety of boards.

Next time somebody pushes corporate quotas as a way to promote gender equity, remember that such policies are largely self-serving measures that make their sponsors feel good but do litle to help average women.

31. The author believes that the bills sponsored by Lewis and Haddad wills________

[A] help little to rece gender bias.

[B] pose a threat to the state government.

[C] raise women's position in politics.

[D] greatly broaden career options.

32. Which of the following is true of the California measure?

[A] It has irritated private business owners.

[B] It is welcomed by the Supreme Court,

[C] It may go against the Constitution.

[D] It will settle the prior controversies.

33. The author mentions the study by Catalyst to ilustrate____

[A] the harm from arbitrary board decision.

[B] the importance of constitutional guaranees.

[C] the pressure on women in global corporations.

[D] the needlessness of government interventions.

34. Norway's adoption of a nationwide corporate gender quota has led to____

[A] the underestimation of elite women's role.

[B] the objection to female participation on boards.

[C] the entry of unqualified candidates into the board.

[D] the growing tension between labor and management.

35. Which of the following can be inferred from the text?

[A] Women's need in employment should be considered.

[B] Feasibility should be a prime concern in policymaking.

[C] Everyone should try hard to promote social justice.

[D] Major social issues should be the focus of legislation.

Text 4

Last Thursday, the French Senate passed a digital services tax, which would impose an entirely new tax

on large multinationals that provide digital services to consumers or users in France. Digital services include everything from providing a platform for selling goods and services online to targeting advertising based on user data, and the tax applies to gross revenue from such servces. Many French politicians and media outlets have referred to this as a“GAFA tax," meaning that it is designed to apply primarily to companies such as Google, Apple, Facebook and Amazon- in other words, multiational tech companies based in the United States.

The digital services tax now awaits the signature of President Emmanuel Macron, who has expressed support for the measure, and it could go into effect within the next few weeks. But it has already sparked significant controversy, with the Unite Sates trade representative opening an investigation into whether the tax discriminates against American companies, which in turn could lead to trade sanctions against France.

The French tax is not just a unilateral move by one country in need of revenue. Instead, the digital services tax is part of a much larger trend, with countries over the past few years proposing or putting in place an alphabet soup of new international tax provisions. These have included Britain's DPT (diverted profits tax), Australia's MAAL (multinational antiavoidance law), and India's SEP (significant economic presence) test, to name but a few. At the same time, the European Union, Spain, Britain and several other countries have all seriously contemplated digital services taxes.

These unilateral developments differ in their specifics, but they are all designed to tax multinationals on income and revenue that countries believe they should have a right to tax, even if international tax rules do not grant them that right. In other words, they all share a view that the international tax system has failed to keep ;up with the current economy.

In response to these many unilateral measures, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) is currently working with 131 countries to reach a consensus by the end of 2020 on an international solution. Both France and the United States are involved in the organization' s work, but France's digital services tax and the American response raise questions about what the future holds for the international tax system.

France‘s planned tax is a clear warning: Unless a broad consensus can be reached on reforming the international tax system, other nations are likely to follow suit, and American companies will face a cascade of different taxes from dozens of nations that will prove burdensome and costly.

36. The French Senate has passed a bill to_____

[A] regulate digital services platforms.

[B] protect French companies' interests .

[C] impose a levy on tech multinationals.

[D] curb the influence of advertising.

37. It can be learned from Paragraph 2 that the digital services tax _____

[A] may trigger countermeasures against France.

[B] is apt to arouse criticism at home and abroad.

[C] aims to ease international trade tensions.

[D] will prompt the tech giants to quit France.

38. The countries adopting the unilateral measures share the opinion that _____

[A] redistribution of tech giants' revenue must be ensured.

[B] the current international tax system needs upgrading.

[C] tech multinationals' monopoly should be prevented.

[D] all countries ought to enjoy equal taxing rights.

39. It can be learned from Para 5 that the OECO's current work_____

[A] is being resisted by US companies.

[B] needs to be readjusted immediately.

[C] is faced with uncertain prospects.

[D] needs to in involve more countries.

40. Which of the following might be the. best title for this text?

[A] France Is Confronted with Trade Sanctions

[B] France leads the charge on Digital Tax

[C] France Says "NO" to Tech Multinationals

[D] France Demands a Role in the Digital Economy

考研英語真題：閱讀理解的內容小編就說到這里了，更多關於考研備考技巧，報名入口，報名時間，考研成績查詢，報名費用，准考證列印入口及時間等問題，小編會及時更新。希望各位考生都能進入自己的理想考研院校。希望大家能好好復習。取得佳績。

⑤ 2019年MBA考試英語閱讀理解真題及答案

MBA聯考英語真題試題及解析

鏈接：

若資源有問題歡迎追問~

⑥ 英語閱讀理解答案

閱讀。

對於閱讀來說，一定要先聽課，不然你找不到規律受打擊的，我先聽了天道考研魚姐的閱讀理解課，報名可以找紅俠老師的，還給了我優惠券呢。對於閱讀真題永遠是第一位的。英語二主要是2010改革之後才出現，但是前面幾年的英語一的真題也要做。我是從2月份開始做的，從1998年一直做到2016的英語一真題，再從2010年開始做到2017年的英語二真題。對於20考研的同學們來說，真題從2000年做就可以了，一直到2018年，大概有十幾套，足夠你研究好幾個月了。

首先我談下參考用書，我的英語資料大部分是在上一屆考研之後從學姐那裡買的，還有一些是學校圖書館清理雜物時我撿的。當時秉持的是能省一點就省一點的想法，後來發現，不能顧此失彼，適當地省錢很重要，但是時間一定更重要。一般來說，大家都會選擇張劍的黃皮書，這也是考研英語的標配了。

其次，我分享下自己做真題的具體步驟。真題只做一遍是不夠的，也不能為求遍數而盲目地刷很多遍的真題，每做一遍，就要奔著每一次的目標，同時要總結每一次的收獲，這樣刷題才有意義。最近學到一句話「減肥，不能緊盯著體重計上的數字」，同樣，對於真題中的閱讀，也不能緊盯著你的正確率。

第一遍做真題閱讀，目的是「沒有一個單詞不認識，沒有一個句子看不懂」。我主要是計時15分鍾做完一篇閱讀及題目，對下答案，對自己的正確率心裡有個數，然後全文翻譯，一定要寫下來，把翻譯不正確的句子和單詞拿出來反復記誦。第一遍的時候我從不糾結於錯了多少，但是我確實需要第一遍的正確率來做一下參考數值，這樣好與後面第二遍第三遍做的正確率想比照，看看自己是否真的有長進。這樣不斷地做題、翻譯、背誦，基本上可以對十幾套真題有個比較深刻的了解。在不斷地做題時我也發現第我一遍的正確率穩定在每篇錯兩個及以下這樣。這樣的一個工程量耗時很久，且很需要耐心，也是整個考研英語復習過程中最重要的事情。此時你不需要跟別人比較速度和做題量，每天下午選擇一篇閱讀進行這樣一套流程，盡量不要間斷，這樣跟英語建立起親切友好的夥伴關系就好。

第二遍做真題閱讀，目的是總結出題規律，掌握答題技巧。這一遍因為已經有了以前的功底，可以說理解文章大意已經不難了，這時候可以把重心轉向題目上。閱讀的題目類型無非就是細節題、詞彙題等幾類，天道考研的講義裡面老師都總結了。這個時候你再一遍做題時，一方面是看你之前背過的句子和單詞有哪些已經遺忘了，或是有哪些以前認識的現在不認識了，另一方面是總結歸納你錯的題目主要是哪些類型，以及你錯的原因是什麼，自己進行一個總結，並且針對不同的題型以及你常出錯的原因做出相應的措施，尋找一些答題的技巧，這個階段可以多藉助真題的答案解析。這個歸納總結的過程希望你們可以自己做，網課教你的是方法，但是還是靠自己學的。有餘力的情況下，你還可以根據文章內容總結下文章的段落大意、文章的行文框架、文章的體裁等，這對於掌握答題技巧都很有幫助。

第三遍做閱讀，目的是練習速度。比如以前你是一篇一篇做，現在就可以合起來，一次做四到六篇（包括新題型、完型），計算下你的時間，根據你的速度來做一些調整。須知，在考試的時候，時間不夠也是很常出現的情況。到後期的時候，可以留一到兩套卷子用作模擬考試。因為考試的時候你碰到的卷子是全新的，並不是你現在做了很多遍的真題，所以需要鍛煉下自己對陌生卷子的心裡承受能力。我在11月底的時候有用2016年卷子全真模擬了下，很客觀的給自己算分，大概是80分左右，最後跟我的考試成績也差不多。

第四遍，目的是保持手感。在進行第四遍的時候，基本上已經是11月-12月左右，這個時候政治和專業課還有英語作文的壓力都非常大，所以英語真題我是每天做兩篇，保持手感就好。

⑦ 英語閱讀理解題：

47 D 主要原因在於孩子的父親也就是穿黑色外套的男人搶了醫生的車 耽誤了兩個多小時。他父親不知道是就他孩子的醫生。
48 D 我想孩子的父親搶車不是為了占為己有，是為了救他的孩子，要快點到醫院吧

⑧ 英語閱讀理解題

1泊分の場合は、空を見て何かを移動して、あなたが輝く前に見たことがない、それは彗星（コメット）見えるかもしれない。
彗星は星のように見えます。惑星と同様に、彗星は獨自の光をしている。同社は、 （反射）を反映して輝く太陽の光から、地球と同様に、彗星は太陽のラウンドは、はるかに長いパスになるが、 （軌道）よりも、地球の旅。
彗星は星ではない場合は、それは何ですか？
一部の科學者たちは、彗星の大部分は水の氷の破片に凍っていると考えて鉄や岩のちりと、おそらくいくつかの大きな岩の破片を混ぜた場合は太陽の光（ ）は、彗星の氷を溶かす溶け、ガス雲の大移動終了した後、後続。これらの雲は、一緒にほこり、長い尾を形成する。
私たちのために、おそらく多くの人々は彗星を見ている。しかし誰もが知っている方法を、多くの彗星が、彗星の何百萬、數することができるだけ近くなるだけ。
英國エドモンドハレーは、 1656から1742に住んで、彗星の姿を通じ、 sky.Some彗星の外に移動することがback.Othersを取るのパスについて多くを定期的にいつでも戻ってくるという名前を発見し、この巨大な彗星これは、ハレー彗星にちなんで命名された彼が戻ってきて、一人がそれを皆さんagain.Maybeハレーの彗星が來るのかを見て、太陽に近いため、付屬の地上にいた1年の最後の時間1986.Then世界中の人々が夜に外を見ていた。あなたはおそらく、地球の近くに來るハレーの彗星を再度確認することができます。
1.A彗星ですlike______
地球A.sun B.moon C.sunlight D.the
彗星の大部分です2.A _____
A.waterとロック
氷の塊にB.water凍結と鉄との混合
C.ice 、鉄や岩のほこり
D.only岩のいくつかの大きな作品
多くの人々 3.Maybe _____
A.haven 'トンを見た彗星は彗星のすべてのB.have
彗星を見たC.have D.have晝間に彗星を見た
彗星4.Someてくるbak_______
D.at A.atいつでもB.at正午C.at正規回晝間
5.Halley '彗星秒だったback______
A.in 1990 B.in 1980 C.in 1986 D.in 1989
如果你看看天空的一個晚上，並看到一些移動和光輝你從未有過的，它可能是一顆彗星（彗星） 。
彗星有時看起來像明星。就像一個地球，彗星並沒有根據自己。它的陽光照耀它反映（反射） 。與地球一樣，彗星不用一輪太陽，但在更長的道路（軌道）比地球的旅行。
如果一個彗星不是一個明星，它是什麼呢？
一些科學家認為，有很大一部分是彗星水凍結成塊的冰和混合鐵和岩塵，也許幾大塊的岩石。當陽光融化（融化）的冰彗星，偉大的氣體雲去落後之後。這些雲彩，連同灰塵，形成長長的尾巴。
許多人也許已經看到了彗星。但是沒有人知道有多少彗星有。可能會有數以百萬計的彗星，但只有少數接近足以讓我們看到。
一個英國人任命何厚鏵哈雷，誰住1656年至1742年，發現了許多關於彗星的路徑，採取通過sky.Some彗星搬出我們的視線，並從未back.Others回來定期倍。一個大的彗星，讓回來後，被任命為哈雷因為他是一個誰出什麼時候會回來again.Maybe您所見過的哈雷慧星，因為它是最後一次來到靠近太陽和地球是在一年1986.Then世界各地的人以外，晚上看看它。您可能能夠看到哈雷慧星時候再次接近地球。
簡彗星是like______
A.sun B.moon C.sunlight D.the地球
2.A很大一部分彗星是_____
A.water和搖滾
B.water凍結成塊的冰和混合鐵
C.ice ，鐵和岩塵
D.only幾大塊岩石
3.Maybe許多人_____
A.haven '噸看到任何彗星B.have看到彗星
C.have看到彗星在白天看到一顆彗星D.have
4.Some彗星保持未來bak_______
A.at任何時候B.at中午C.at白天經常倍D.at
5.Halley的彗星來到back______
A.in 1990年B.in 1980年C.in 1986年D.in 1989年
1.D
2.C
3.D
4.C
5.C